![hsmworks posts hsmworks posts](https://content.instructables.com/ORIG/FU3/6AAK/I11YVICT/FU36AAKI11YVICT.png)
Mercedes-Benz left Dassault for NX as did Chrysler.
![hsmworks posts hsmworks posts](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/bc/dc/a6/bcdca61a5e0d29a81165a77001122503.jpg)
Anyone who says they can’t leave because reason #1 #2 or #3 does not remember well. It is a self-evident truth that once a company decides that legal extortion is their business model customer consideration other than being an ATM has ended. Verify for yourself what others are saying. Why try to entice voluntary customer payments with improvements when you can just tell them what you want? All of the Autodesk products I read about in the subscriber forum have users complaining about feature atrophy and increased bugs and time to fix bugs. In conjunction with this is that they will simply stop expending as much money improving and bug fixing their products. So they snip customary important parts off and put it in a fee building environment. It can be available right now for an extra fee on top of the 35% scheduled increase of perpetual by 2019. The removal of Backplotting from Cimco inside of HSM is a perfect example. Number two is to remove features traditionally a part of a program and charge you an extra fee to get back what you once had as a seat holder and if you are stupid enough to go there as a subscriber.
![hsmworks posts hsmworks posts](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxrXONkXcAAFbaz.jpg)
Number one is hold your data hostage where their value added model is the pain of leaving is greater than the pain of dramatic fee increases. Thanks a lot Darth Vader Anagnost and the rest. Two methods appear to be the way they intend to do this. The other as you will read below was from #936 of the “upFront eZine” It goes right along with what people are saying on the moving to subscription forums regarding feature shrink and ways to raise the cost of staying with Autodesk.